Agentic AI, computer vision, generative AI
Web, mobile, and custom software
Engineering, warehousing, analytics
Farm, livestock, and crop software
Traceability and food supply chain
EHR, telehealth, and interoperability
ERP implementation and support
Dynamics 365 and Business Central
CRM consulting and integration
B2B ecommerce, ERP integrations and migrations
Folio3 Dynamics helps mid-market manufacturers implement Dynamics 365 with the right tier for the operation. That means Business Central for simpler setups, and Finance and Operations for plants running mixed-mode production, multi-entity finance, or regulated traceability. Cost transparency before you sign, and no workarounds on go-live day.
The typical shortlist puts you between three bad options. Every one of them locks in a partner-side or platform-side failure on day one, and you spend the next two years managing around it.
You buy a system built for simpler operations because it fits today. Twelve months in you add a second legal entity, or a process manufacturing line, or a regulator asking questions about lot control. The workarounds start. By year two you're running spreadsheets alongside a six-figure ERP investment, and nobody wants to reconcile at close.
You get quoted on SAP S/4HANA or Oracle Cloud. The scope and cost are both sized for a company three times your revenue. Two years in, you're spending more managing the platform than running the business, and go-live keeps slipping.
Discrete-only or process-only ERPs handle exactly what they were built for. The other half of the plant runs on spreadsheets, ISV extensions, or a second system nobody wants to reconcile at close, and the costing model drifts until nobody trusts the reports anymore.
Cloud-native ERP for single-site manufacturers running discrete assembly with straightforward financials. Faster to stand up, and often the right call for mid-market operations where the setup is straightforward.
Company size
SMB to mid-market
Complexity
Standard to moderate
Deployment
Cloud-native
Manufacturing
Discrete assembly, light process
Multi-entity
Basic consolidations
Rapid Start timeline
60 to 90 days
Enterprise-grade ERP for manufacturers with mixed-mode production, multi-entity finance, or regulated traceability. The same platform Fortune 500 manufacturers rely on, configured for mid-market scale.
Company size
Mid-market to enterprise
Complexity
High, multi-mode
Deployment
Global, multi-currency
Manufacturing
All four production modes
Multi-entity
Native intercompany, global tax
Standard timeline
6 to 9 months
Your pet-food line extrudes kibble in the morning (process) and packs configured treat kits in the afternoon (discrete). Your cosmetics team mixes formulations upstairs and fills display SKUs on the floor below. Most cloud ERPs make you split those onto two systems and reconcile at close. Finance and Operations handles both in the same legal entity.
Discrete, process, lean, and project-based production run in the same legal entity, each following its own recipe and order type. Inventory dimensions, resource models, and costing structures stay unified across modes, which means one system carrying one cost model and one lot history through the whole plant.
In food, beverage, chemicals, or cosmetics, your operation lives on lot genealogy from raw material to finished dispatch. Recalls are enforceable and potency variance is auditable. If your ERP isn't configured to handle it on day one, your team ends up recreating that history under pressure when the auditor shows up.
Formula management, batch orders, potency and catch-weight tracking, and full lot genealogy configured natively in the platform. Finite scheduling handles constrained resources across work centers, and audit trails run automatically as records post.
A US headquarters, a Mexico maquiladora, and a Canadian distribution entity. Three currencies, three tax regimes, and one consolidated close, plus intercompany transactions that need to net cleanly without spreadsheets or JV entries booked from someone's memory.
Multi-entity consolidations and country-specific tax and compliance frameworks run natively in the platform. Intercompany transactions post automatically. The shop floor and the consolidated close use the same system, so quarter-end reconciliation stops being manual work.
Natural-language planning queries, AI-driven warehouse picking, and Copilot Studio agents that draft supplier correspondence and flag lead-time exceptions. All of it ships with the Dynamics 365 release cadence, so it's part of the platform your implementation configures, and there's no separate AI project to scope.
Structured migration paths off every legacy Dynamics or SAP system as Microsoft's support clock runs out. AX extended support ended in January 2023. GP new license sales stopped in April 2025, and NAV 2016 reaches end of life in April 2026. SAP ECC mainstream maintenance runs out in 2027. Every migration starts with a scoped assessment before the cutover date gets set.
Shop-floor systems talking to your ERP: MES, SCADA, WMS, EDI, and 3PL platforms. Microsoft's standard connectors cover most of them, and Folio3's BURQ iPaaS platform covers what Microsoft doesn't. Middleware you don't want to maintain stays out of the picture.
Multi-entity, multi-currency consolidations on a shared chart of accounts, with country-specific regulatory frameworks handled through native configuration in the platform. Your close runs on the same system as your shop floor.
MRP and master planning across bills of materials and purchase orders, with AI-driven demand forecasting on top. Weekly ops reviews get built from natural-language queries against live data, so ad-hoc BI work isn't the bottleneck anymore.
Not every failed implementation needs a rip-and-replace. The team runs a scoped audit of where the project stalled, keeps the configuration that's working, and rebuilds the parts that aren't. Much of the practice's work is rescuing Dynamics 365 projects that ran over budget or missed go-live.
Book a demo with a Folio3 Dynamics manufacturing lead. Walk through Dynamics 365 configured for your operation. Bring your questions.
The client was using Magento for eCommerce and D365 FSM for backend operations and faced challenges with manual data syncing between the two systems, leading to errors and inefficiencies. To support business growth, they sought to automate data synchronization and streamline operations.
Burq iPaaS streamlined the integration between Magento and D365, syncing product details, inventory, prices, orders, and customer accounts. It also ensured seamless product mapping and streamlined data flow across both systems.
It significantly impacted TricorBraun process efficiency by over 95%. They were able to achieve near real-time data synchronization between their systems with a 100% data accuracy rate.
It's driven by how the operation runs, and company size is only loosely correlated. Business Central fits single-site discrete operations with straightforward financials. Finance and Operations fits operations with mixed-mode production, multi-entity finance, regulated traceability, or plant-floor integrations at scale. Your ERP Complexity and Value Assessment produces a tier recommendation before any contract.
It depends on which options you're comparing. Acumatica and NetSuite lead on financials for simpler operations, but they need extensions for process manufacturing and multi-entity operations at scale. Epicor Kinetic has strong discrete manufacturing with lighter native financials and AI. Dynamics 365 covers all four production modes with enterprise-grade financials and native Copilot on one platform. Your specific fit depends on which of those you actually need, and that's what the assessment resolves.
It depends on the path. Business Central Rapid Start goes live in 60 to 90 days on fixed scope, and full-scope Business Central engagements typically run 6 to 18 months. Finance and Operations standard implementations run 6 to 9 months, and full-scope Finance and Operations engagements typically run 1 to 3 years across a phased rollout. Your ERP Complexity and Value Assessment produces a scoped timeline against your specific profile before you commit.
Yes, with a cutover strategy matched to your risk tolerance and transaction volume, whether that's a big-bang cutover, a phased rollout, or a parallel run. The higher-risk decision is skipping the pre-migration assessment, which is where configuration debt and data quality issues get surfaced before they become go-live problems.
No. Copilot for Supply Chain is included in the platform release cadence and configured during standard implementation, with governance and role-based access controls in scope from day one. Data residency settings get configured based on the tenant setup. Custom Copilot Studio agents are additional scope but built on the same platform.
Not always. Much of the practice runs rescue engagements on Dynamics 365 projects that ran over budget or missed go-live. Every rescue starts with a scoped audit of the existing configuration, which produces a plan for what stays and what needs rebuilding. In most cases the platform choice was fine and the recovery is faster than a rip-and-replace would be.
